Archive

Archive for February, 2010

Key Points from “Fascination: The 7 Triggers to Persuasion and Captivation”

February 23rd, 2010 No comments

Book Review from Matthew May for American Express OPEN

Feb 19, 2010 -

I have just finished reading Fascinate: Your 7 Triggers to Persuasion and Captivation, by Sally Hogshead. Sally is an award-winning advertising executive turned brand innovation consultant. In this book, she covers a wide swath of disciplines to weave a story-driven narrative that draws on her original research, a Kelton Study conducted specifically for the book, to look deeply into what captures our attention, and how we can create fascination in our lives and livelihoods.

Her goal in conducting a study of 1,059 Americans over the age of 18 was to define the role of fascination in our lives, and measure it in tangible terms. “Without fascination,” Sally says, “we can’t sell products, persuade shareholders to invest, teach students to read, or convince our own kids to stay off drugs.”

Some of the more interesting results are these:

  • When asked how far they would go for a fascinating life, 60% of people said they’d be willing to bend their morals, standards, or loyalties.
  • Only 9% of employees say their bosses are “extremely fascinating,” but 96% of parents say they’re fascinated by their own children.
  • A fascinating brand can charge up to four times as much as an un-fascinating one.
  • On average people will pay $288 per month to be the most fascinating person in the room. Five percent will pay more than $1000 per month. (Women will spend more to be fascinating than they spend on food. In fact, women will spend more to be fascinating than they spend on food and clothes combined.)

These results raise the obvious question: what does it take to be fascinating? The answer, according to Sally, is that it takes some blend of the seven triggers, which are defined as deeply rooted primal means of arousing intense interest:

  1. Lust: the anticipation of pleasure, which we crave.
  2. Mystique: unanswered questions, which intrigues us and makes us want to solve the puzzle (read rest of article)
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
Tags:

Is Your Company/Brand Even Worth a Conversation?

February 22nd, 2010 No comments

Great article from Mahesh Murthy for the Journal (click for original article)

By MAHESH MURTHY

From the WSJ’s India Chief Mentor blog, produced by a panel of Indian entrepreneurs and investors, at wsj.com/mentor:

One thing I learned from my days in traditional advertising is that a brand doesn’t exist on shelves—it exists in the hearts and minds of people. Your brand is the sum total of perceptions about your product in the heads of your relevant audience.

If that’s true, then online media are the most important place for your brand image to be established, defended and grown. This is where your offering comes face-to-face with your audience and where its responses can be measured, shaped and—if need be—countered in real time. This is where perceptions can be built, person by person.

This brand building is more effective that the mode we’ve employed until now: TV commercials with 30 seconds of well-produced fiction that try to sell a brand image. It is more credible and much less expensive. In fact, it can cost you nothing, if you have the knack and can do it right. Not too many TV campaigns can match that.

Zero-budget advertising is a phrase no traditional advertising firm wants to hear. The old ad business is predicated on your spending lots of money buying space and time in media vehicles such as this one. But if you look at recent times, it’s a model that is dying.

Look at some of the world’s biggest brands. Google, Amazon, Ferrari, Starbucks, Ikea, eBay, Zara, Yahoo, Apple, Harley Davidson, Reuters and Goldman Sachs are a dozen among the 100 top brands in the world per a recent study by brand management firm Interbrand, each with a “brand value” that averages $10 billion. Word of mouth played a major role in building those brands. We await the Apple iPad with no ads released yet, we talk of Google Buzz without having ever seen a Google ad, and we throng to a Zara outlet without seeing its commercials on TV.

Today, the best way to establish your brand among big-hitter rivals is to make it remark-worthy and generate conversations free of charge. See how Red Bull took on big-ad-buying Coke and Pepsi with a product that sold at a higher price for a smaller pack size and built it to a billion-dollar brand with little advertising? The new axiom, call it Mahesh’s Law, is this: your marketing IQ is inversely proportional to your marketing budget. (Read Rest of Article from WSJ)

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
Tags:

Buzzin’ Through The Back Door…

February 19th, 2010 No comments

Interesting back door for Google BUZZ. I am at a client’s office and they have Websense installed so I can’t access any of my social media outlets. But I can access BUZZ because it runs through the Gmail conduit.

Does this mean office workers with no access to video sites, social networking sites, etc. will now flock to using BUZZ to stay connected…interesting!

Endeavour Marketing and Media – A Full Service Murfreesboro, TN Advertising Agency

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
Tags:

Microsoft, Facebook and MySpace Answer Google Buzz Challenge with Outlook Plug-In

February 18th, 2010 No comments

From MediaPost (read original article)

Undeterred by the firestorm of criticism over Google Buzz, Microsoft is ramping up its social efforts through new partnerships with Facebook and MySpace.

Per the deals, both Facebook and MySpace will be integrated into Outlook Social Connector — the socially souped-up version of Microsoft’s email client — which will allow users to view friends’ activities, photos, and status updates within Outlook, as well as grow their network by adding friends from the same view.

Both Facebook for Outlook and MySpace for Outlook are expected to be available later this year upon the official release of Microsoft’s Office 2010.

Separately on Wednesday, Microsoft announced the public beta of LinkedIn for Outlook, which will let Office 2010 Beta users connect the OSC to a public network for the first time.

The service will allow LinkedIn users to view their colleagues’ status updates and photos alongside e-mail messages.

Meanwhile, colleagues’ latest contact information from LinkedIn automatically updates their Outlook contact. Whenever someone changes a phone number, e-mail address, or other contact details, it’s automatically updated in Outlook.

Keenly aware of the privacy concerns that such services can raise, Microsoft is promising that the privacy and permissions settings on the Facebook and MySpace networks will be “represented and respected.”

For example, if a user’s profile photo and job title are publicly listed on a given network, then other OSC users will see their photo and job title when receiving an e-mail from them — if they use that same network.

“Similarly, if you choose to restrict profile access on a given network, the OSC will respect that privacy,” said Outlook product manager Dev Balasubramanian and Outlook program manager Michael Affronti in a co-authored blog post.

“The goal of the OSC is not to create another social network or set of privacy settings for you to manage, but rather to bring the networks you already value and use to the Outlook experience.”

Microsoft first announced Outlook Social Connector last November, along with the beta of Microsoft Office 2010. Other social endeavors include Windows Live blog social network.

Google — which itself has had little success in the world of social media — continues to face criticism over Google Buzz more than a week after its debut. Despite refining the Gmail add-on’s privacy settings several times, the Electronic Privacy Information Center on Tuesday filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission over Buzz.

Earlier this month, Facebook said it would no longer run Microsoft display ads on its popular social network. The two companies did, however, agree to expand their search partnership.

The development came over three years after Microsoft announced a deal to sell ads on Facebook, and two years since it shelled out $240 million for a 1.6% stake in the top social network.

Microsoft’s online services division just reported a 5% year-over-year decline — despite the fact that Bing’s market share has been up for 7 straight months — while online ad revenue was down 2%.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
Tags:

Google BUZZ – What Are Sergey and Larry Up To?

February 17th, 2010 No comments

Google BUZZ launched last week and it’s already shaking up the Social Media landscape.  Though Google has been launching a new product seemingly every week (Chrome, Wave, Droid Operating System, etc.) this one comes with more louder Thunder and more Lightning Bolts from atop Mt. Googlempus!

What is it?

If you have a Gmail account and have checked it the past week, you probably know but if not, Google Buzz is a simple tool to post, communicate and share through the Gmail service (which is free like Facebook, Twitter, Friend Feed, etc.).  Think about a cross between the ease of use and ability to follow anyone by Twitter and the deeper sharing and multimedia capabilities of Facebook.

Are People Using This?

Yep.  The first 2 days saw 160,000 Buzz posts PER HOUR and 300,000 Mobile check-ins PER DAY.

Why Would Someone Use This?

The most obvious answer is that it automatically shows up on your Gmail account (no need to sign up for it).  Think about how Internet Explorer became so famous – when you turned on a new computer, there was the IE logo begging you to click it. Also, it’s brutally simple to use. Lastly, it’s within your realm of usage every day, meaning that if you’re a Gmail user, it’s already tied in to other tools you’re using from Google like Calendar, Wave…heck if you have a Droid Phone (runs on a Google Operating System) – it’s there too because when you activate your phone it prompts you to provide your Gmail address or sign up for one!  Buzz is EVERYWHERE if you have a Gmail account.

What about its Mobile “Local” Feature?

This is really the coolest thing about BUZZ!  If you access Buzz through any GPS-enabled phone, it identifies your location and serves up the Buzz from people in a close proximity to you even if you’re following them or not.  You know what restaurant people are eating at around your location, what movie they are seeing, etc. (as long as they are Buzzing from their phone and close enough to you).

Any Stumbling Blocks?

Privacy concerns.  When Buzz first launched it auto-followed people IT thought you should and auto-suggested people to follow based on your Gmail habits.  Google responded FAST and quickly turned the auto-follow to auto-suggest and added a disable Buzz completely feature.  They probably should have taken a look at Facebook’s numerous stumbles in this area.

Will it Threaten the Big 2?

Yes, but not likely to do too much damage because Facebook users and Twitter users are loyal to their products.  It was instantly bigger than Twitter at launch based on number of users thanks to a built in Gmail user base to tap but has not come close to the total number of posts that Twitter has.  Plus Twitter has a great open API ensuring that more applications are in the pipeline at all times.  Buzz also has an open API ensuring innovative apps in the pipeline but with the Droid phone having a built-in  “marketplace” like the iPhone, this creates a potential revenue stream for Buzz because they could possibly charge for Buzz apps.

We’re still playing with Buzz at Endeavour Labs and it’s still early to tell how people are going to adopt it and how competitors will respond but it looks like Google has a bonafide hit on its hands!  We’ll keep you updated on how this thing progresses!

Endeavour Marketing & Media

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
Tags:

Yelp Reviews – Is Your Head in the Sand or are You Actively Managing?

February 16th, 2010 No comments

The point of social media that most businesses still find uncomfortable is the fact that they CAN’T CONTROL THE MESSAGE!

While true, you can MANAGE THE MESSAGE!

Social Media, in the form of local business review sites (Yelp, Chowhound, Yahoo Local, etc.) continues to gain momentum and simply hoping that your customers will not engage with each other concerning your business, product or service is wishful thinking.  Negative reviews attract more negative reviews. If somebody gives your business a negative review then that is not only something you need to be aware of (think secret shopper) so that you can fix it, but also, this is an opportunity to truly engage the reviewer to make it right!  Avoiding Yelp is no different than if someone came to your place of business, told you of a problem and you simply turned your back and walked away.

So…as a business how can you manage Yelp (and other review sites for that matter):

1) Claim your Business – just go to Yelp, find your business and hit the claim button.  It’s as easy as submitting your information for verification.

2) Update your Business Listing – add your hours of business, photos, a weblink, etc.  Make certain that information is up to date.

3) Manage your Business Listing – when you claim a business, you put your email address in and you are automatically alerted when someone reviews your business.  When someone writes a positive review, respond and thank them both publicly in the form of the message board on your listing and also privately by sending them a direct message.  When someone writes a negative review, get a feel for who this reviewer is.  Are they an active Yelper or is their first comment just about your business?  They could be from a competitor so do a bit of research (Google) about who you are dealing with.  If you feel the review is legit, then address the problem head-on.  Try a direct message first to test the waters and see if you can make the problem right (the last thing you want to do is get into a back and forth on the message board!).  If you feel you can rectify the problem, do so and then post publicly so viewers can see that you are actively trying to resolve.  Also, if you make the problem right and the customer is now satisfied, ask them to UPDATE their review.

Folks, it’s all about communication.  Frankly, most customers that post a negative review have a legitimate concern. If you can solve it, you may have a customer for life.  On the other hand, you’re going to have people that just want to slam you for no good reason – they are always going to be there!  If this is the case, first try to handle it between the two of you and if that doesn’t work, complain to Yelp.  They remove reviews where there is a clear case of conflict of interest, hearsay, etc. (warning may take a while though.)

It’s a brave new world out there and consumers have an ever-growing array of tools to either reward your business or punish your business.  Take your head out of the sand and start actively managing your brand/business online…or else somebody else will do it for you!

Endeavour Marketing and Media – a Full-Service Murfreesboro, TN Advertising Agency

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
Tags:

Old-School Retailer Steps Up New-School Game

February 2nd, 2010 No comments
American Greetings Launches Twitter Contest for Valentine’s Day
By Christopher Heine, ClickZ, Feb 2, 2010

American Greetings kicked off a 12-day Twitter contest yesterday while attempting to build buzz heading into Valentine’s Day. The contest, dubbed “Follow the Love,” will include daily questions to be answered in tweets (140 characters or less) by the brand’s followers.

Each day, the winning tweet will be selected by the company’s in-house judges and then awarded one $100 retailer gift card and a $250 cash gift card. According to the brand’s Twitter page, winners will be announced at 8:30 a.m. EDT the following day. After the stint ends on Feb. 12, the Cleveland, OH-based firm will conduct a grand-prize drawing for $1,000. Read Rest of Article from ClickZ

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
Tags:

Expanding the :30 Super Bowl Spot

February 2nd, 2010 No comments

From Garrick Schmitt for Advertising Age -

The teams playing in this year’s Super Bowl have already been decided, but the Super Bowl shuffle for advertisers began in earnest last month when marketing mainstays like FedEx, General Motors and Pepsi made news by announcing they were opting out of this year’s ad extravaganza.

But for those looking to gauge the health of the ad industry, Super Bowl advertising is a bit of red herring. CBS is charging about $2.5 million for 30 seconds of commercial time — and rightly so. Rarely do you get so many Americans watching one event and actually enjoying the advertising. It’s a tremendous opportunity for most brand marketers and we’d be foolish to look at this year’s Super Bowl as proof of either the rejuvenation of the 30-second spot or the rejection of it.

That doesn’t mean some won’t try. After all, last year Hulu saw a 50% increase in site traffic after running ads during the Super Bowl and Denny’s traffic to its website soared nearly 1,700% as consumers sought information about its free breakfast promotion.

There certainly will be advertising winners (and losers) on Super Bowl Sunday but let’s hope that the Monday morning quarterback chatter doesn’t obscure the larger shift at hand for marketers this year. 2010 will be the year of the “platform” for advertisers. Read Rest of Article

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
Tags:

How Mobile Advertising Might Be Tailor Made for Aiding Charity

February 2nd, 2010 No comments

-By Bob Walczak for AdWeek (click for original article)
When we heard about the devastating earthquake that took place in Haiti, most of us thought about how we could help those affected. Many look toward donating online or even calling in their donations, but, early on, what most consumers did not think about was donating via the device they carry with themselves at all times — the mobile phone.

The American Red Cross recognized the importance of the mobile medium and worked directly with mGive-Mobile Accord to develop the text message mobile campaign where mobile users can text “Haiti” (90999) to submit their $10 donation. The campaign experienced immediate success and over only a two-week period raised close to $30 million, which goes toward aiding those impacted by the disaster.

Shortly after the text campaign was launched, leading mobile advertising players joined forces to further utilize the mobile medium. AdMob, Eyeblaster, Jumptap, Microsoft Advertising, Millennial Media, Ringleader Digital and other networks were approached by mGive-Mobile Accord to develop the mobile advertising campaign designed to broaden the reach of the American Red Cross Haiti relief efforts via the organization’s text messaging mobile campaign.

While the campaigns will continue to run through February, the companies have already learned a great deal from them. What has been most evident is the power of the mobile medium for disaster relief efforts. What separates these campaigns from others previously developed?

In this case, it starts with the companies involved. The collaboration of multiple companies in the mobile industry opened up a larger pool of consumers to target. Instead of placing banner ads on a specific number of publisher sites across one ad network, these companies were able to unite their efforts to place banner ads across several publisher sites. This resulted in a much larger pool of consumers that could be impacted by the message of these campaigns.

The companies involved also learned that their combined efforts led to faster implementation of the call to action-important, of course, for a crisis of this magnitude. The relationship built between the mobile advertising players and mGive-Mobile Accord will also go a long way toward rallying future support and will inevitably lead to future discussions on how to best utilize the mobile medium quickly and effectively.

The convenience of the mobile campaign cannot be underestimated. In this day and age, consumers are looking for the easiest and fastest way to accomplish a task. This is no different when it comes to charitable donations. The ease of use with these campaigns really helped to accomplish that high number of people texting their donations. Consumers could see either the banner ad on their phone, or any commercial discussing the text campaign, and immediately send the message. What was even more effective was how consumers did not have to enter any banking information. The $10 donation was automatically added to their monthly bill.

The mobile campaign was far more successful than those involved had even dared to hope. It’s good to know that should disaster strike again, the mobile industry can effectively join forces and create campaigns aimed at helping those in need.

Bob Walczak is CEO of Ringleader Digital.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
Tags:

Toyota Tries to Put the “Spin” on the “Stick”…gas pedals that is!

February 2nd, 2010 No comments

NEW YORK (AdAge.com) — The mea culpa and brand-saving by Toyota Motor Corp. began today, as the embattled carmaker launched a public relations defensive on all fronts — print, TV and social-media networks — in a bid to salvage its image in the wake of the 2.3 million vehicle recall.

After buying full-page print ads in the 20 of the nation’s largest newspapers on Sunday, the Japanese automaker today sent Toyota Motor Sales USA’s president-chief operating officer, Jim Lentz, to the “Today” show, where he talked to host Matt Lauer about why the company halted sales and production of eight models over an accelerator-pedal-sticking issue. “This will be under control,” Mr. Lentz said, at the same time denying that Toyota dragged its feet on the issue. Read Rest of Article

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
Tags: